<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>migrosch.de &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.migrosch.de/categories/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.migrosch.de</link>
	<description>All about Life, SEO, Web Development, Web Standards and all the rest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:04:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Sun&#8217;s VirtualBox, the better Parallels or Fusion?</title>
		<link>http://www.migrosch.de/2008/09/suns-virtualbox-the-better-parallels-or-fusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.migrosch.de/2008/09/suns-virtualbox-the-better-parallels-or-fusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.migrosch.de/2008/09/suns-virtualbox-the-better-parallels-or-fusion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After being a bit frustrated with the performance of Parallels on my MacBook Pro (2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM), I gave VMware Fusion a try last week. At first glance its performance footprint on the host system didn&#8217;t seem as heavy as the one from Parallels Desktop for Mac. Of course switching [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being a bit frustrated with the performance of Parallels on my MacBook Pro (2.33 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM), I gave <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/fusion/">VMware Fusion</a> a try last week. At first glance its performance footprint on the host system didn&#8217;t seem as heavy as the one from <a href="http://www.parallels.com/en/products/desktop/">Parallels Desktop for Mac</a>. Of course switching between host and guest system is always a tedious task for he machine. With Parallels I often observed that some of the applications running on the host system stalled, showing me the colorful beach ball of death. This can get really annoying.</p>
<p>After a while, I observed a similar behavior even with Fusion and I got more frustrated, wanting to throw the whole machine out the window, or maybe throwing Windows out the machine (I can&#8217;t remember). Anyway, to make the long story short, I stumbled across Sun&#8217;s <a href="http://www.virtualbox.org/">VirtualBox</a>, which is Open Source and just love it. Its footprint on the host performance is almost imperceptible. It boots Windows XP Profession in 1 Minute! Of course VirtualBox is not as feature laden as Parallels or Fusion. But I need the system mainly for browser tests (don&#8217;t we all love Internet Explorer?) and some applications that only run on Windows, so I don&#8217;t need features like 3D graphic acceleration, Coherence etc. That&#8217;s why VirtualBox is now my first choice when it comes to virtualization solutions for the Mac.</p>
<p>Thank you Sun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.migrosch.de/2008/09/suns-virtualbox-the-better-parallels-or-fusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Streets of San Francisco (and Seattle)</title>
		<link>http://www.migrosch.de/2006/03/the-streets-of-san-francisco-and-seattle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.migrosch.de/2006/03/the-streets-of-san-francisco-and-seattle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 06:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.migrosch.de/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, this is not about a ride down memory lane to join Karl Malden and Michael Douglas but rather about Microsoft&#8217;s new feature over at Windows Live Local, called Street-Side. Yesterday the team pulled the curtain off their technology preview.
So what&#8217;s Street-Side all about? For that I would like to quote what Microsoft has to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, this is not about a ride down memory lane to join Karl Malden and Michael Douglas but rather about Microsoft&#8217;s new feature over at <a href="http://local.live.com/">Windows Live Local</a>, called <a href="http://preview.local.live.com/">Street-Side</a>. Yesterday the team pulled the curtain off their technology preview.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s Street-Side all about? For that I would like to quote what Microsoft has to say about it:</p>
<blockquote><p>Historically, maps give you a perspective of geographical information about a place. In Windows Live™ Local, powered by Virtual Earth™, you’ve seen road, aerial, and hybrid maps. Then, we introduced bird&#8217;s eye views to give you a perspective from above. Now, we want you to be there, right in front of the pizza shop you are searching for, in the street-side views offered by Windows Live Local. Even though you haven’t left the comfort of your computer chair, you’ll feel like you’re actually there.</p></blockquote>
<p>At first glance virtually driving or walking around San Francisco or Seattle doesn&#8217;t sound very appealing to me because I&#8217;m more for the real life experience. But it might be a nice tool for getting in depth driving directions. That way you have the possibility to memorize landmarks, which usually are not part of &#8220;traditional&#8221; driving directions tools. At second glance it stresses Microsoft&#8217;s growing eagerness to grab a large slice of the <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html">web 2.0</a> cake. In my opinion this new feature together will Microsoft&#8217;s other new web based services also shows that there are quite a few creative heads in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redmond%2C_Oregon">Redmond</a> who do their best to help Bill Gates take a look outside the desktop box. But I don&#8217;t quite agree with Michael Arrington&#8217;s when he titles his post abou this new service &#8220;<a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/02/28/killer-new-livecom-service-street-side/">Killer New Live.com Service: Street-Side</a>&#8220;. It&#8217;s just taking another step along the maps/satellite path. Of course now the perspective has changed to street level but I think it&#8217;s not as innovative as for example the introduction of <a href="http://maps.google.com/">Google maps</a> was. But that&#8217;s just <em>my</em> two cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.migrosch.de/2006/03/the-streets-of-san-francisco-and-seattle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Explorer 7 Beta 2 Preview</title>
		<link>http://www.migrosch.de/2006/01/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.migrosch.de/2006/01/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Explorer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.migrosch.de/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Dean wrote over at IEBlog, the Internet Explorer 7 Beta 2 Preview is now available to mere mortals, not just MSDN members. I&#8217;ll take it for a quick test ride and tell you more about my experience soon.
UPDATE:

As you can see, IE7 Beta 2 Preview doesn&#8217;t smile on Acid2. But so don&#8217;t many other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Dean wrote over at <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/01/31/520812.aspx">IEBlog</a>, the <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/ie7/default.mspx">Internet Explorer 7 Beta 2 Preview</a> is now available to mere mortals, not just MSDN members. I&#8217;ll take it for a quick test ride and tell you more about my experience soon.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE:</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/alaskana/93697347/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/12/93697347_ae8d9743fa_t.jpg" width="100" height="86" alt="IE 7 Beta 2 on Acid2" /></a><br />
As you can see, IE7 Beta 2 Preview doesn&#8217;t smile on <a href="http://www.webstandards.org/act/acid2/test.html">Acid2</a>. But so don&#8217;t many other browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.migrosch.de/2006/01/internet-explorer-7-beta-2-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
